BOMI
21-12-2006, 10:33 PM
Well its been said that Shell V power is just Optimax renamed :up2sum:
I dont know if this is true or not. I use to use Optimax and found it to be good, fuel econ was 10.5 to 11.0 on the highway and 1/4 mile times were 12.203 @ 114 MPH :bow:
When I was in Sydney for the Skid pan day I used V power on the way to Sydney, around Sydney and on the way back to Wagga 3 1/2 tanks in all, maybe more.
I left from North Parramatta towards the end of peak hour. Fuel econ was bad in the stop start/pedal to the boards driving I was doing. At its peak just before getting onto the Hume it was 24.0L/100 :whip:
On the way back down to Wagga that night it was 15 Degrees with AIT's of 25 Degrees.
Slowly but sure the average fuel econ dropped and dropped and dropped. I was traveling at 118KMH with the cruise control on.
At half a tank, exactly, I had traveled 425 km. That is the best fuel econ I have ever gotten with the car post cam. The car said 10.7L/100KM but the stop start city driving had made the average fuel econ higher. I worked it out off of 37.5 liters (half tank) to be 8.8L/100KM
8.8L/100KM for a Gen III 5.7ltr cam fitted and modified car that is, in my opnion excellent :bow: :bow: :bow:
Shell say that V power gives better econ and performance per fill and ATM I tend to agree with them. Its just a shame that out here in the country I find performance fuels to be hit and miss per fill.
I was tempted, very temped to keep driving to Melbourne to have a crack at Lautrays awesome effort of Sydney to Melbourne on one tank, but, well, Gillian would have killed me :lmao:
Just thought Id share the above with you all as Im very impressed by Shell V Power at the moment :thumbs:
But its not all fuel, the PCM edit and cam as well as highway driving style are also very important factors in these figures. Cheers again Sonny :)
Troy :)
I dont know if this is true or not. I use to use Optimax and found it to be good, fuel econ was 10.5 to 11.0 on the highway and 1/4 mile times were 12.203 @ 114 MPH :bow:
When I was in Sydney for the Skid pan day I used V power on the way to Sydney, around Sydney and on the way back to Wagga 3 1/2 tanks in all, maybe more.
I left from North Parramatta towards the end of peak hour. Fuel econ was bad in the stop start/pedal to the boards driving I was doing. At its peak just before getting onto the Hume it was 24.0L/100 :whip:
On the way back down to Wagga that night it was 15 Degrees with AIT's of 25 Degrees.
Slowly but sure the average fuel econ dropped and dropped and dropped. I was traveling at 118KMH with the cruise control on.
At half a tank, exactly, I had traveled 425 km. That is the best fuel econ I have ever gotten with the car post cam. The car said 10.7L/100KM but the stop start city driving had made the average fuel econ higher. I worked it out off of 37.5 liters (half tank) to be 8.8L/100KM
8.8L/100KM for a Gen III 5.7ltr cam fitted and modified car that is, in my opnion excellent :bow: :bow: :bow:
Shell say that V power gives better econ and performance per fill and ATM I tend to agree with them. Its just a shame that out here in the country I find performance fuels to be hit and miss per fill.
I was tempted, very temped to keep driving to Melbourne to have a crack at Lautrays awesome effort of Sydney to Melbourne on one tank, but, well, Gillian would have killed me :lmao:
Just thought Id share the above with you all as Im very impressed by Shell V Power at the moment :thumbs:
But its not all fuel, the PCM edit and cam as well as highway driving style are also very important factors in these figures. Cheers again Sonny :)
Troy :)